Skip to content




French Banks at Risk

Christian Noyer, governor of France’s central bank said, “The level of capital and the profitability of French banks allow them to absorb all the potential losses on sovereign risks… they don’t need fresh money to honor these commitments”.

What Mr. Noyer might not realize is that capital has little to do with the short term viability of a bank. Perception is everything and short-term liquidity ends up driving the outcome.  If the French banks get enough of a short-term capital drain then the French government will be forced to step in front.  The fall of any one institution in the European Union will drive higher the risk of default in all financial institutions.  The large difference between the United States and that of Europe is that there is no central bank with supreme authority and the fact that european banks are much larger in comparison to their home countries’ GDP’s.

This crisis will not wane until we see a major reduction in perceived credit risk of European banks.  Soc Gen, BNP and Credit Agricole are a good place to start:

Posted in Markets.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


European Bank Risk

The finger pointing and general liquidity drain in the European banking sector seems eerily similar to the post Lehman debacle of 2008.  In fact, if we look at the Euro swap spread at the 10 year point, or the longer term credit risk perceived between European banks we can actually see levels that are only matched by the post Lehman crisis:

European Swap Spreads have Blown Out while US Swap spreads remain muted

There has been significant credit widening in the longer term European intra-bank credit risk premium, but the true sign of bank stress is in short term liquidity.  Despite headlines comparing the current fear to that of 2008, we are no where near the liquidity stress levels of that crisis.   The 3 month Euribor-OIS spread (short-term willingness of banks to lend to each other) has widened, but it remains significantly subdued compared to October of 2008:

The problem is that you only need one big event to send this fear into hyper-gear.  The latest deja-vu comes from today’s BNP Paribas press release:

The Wall Street Journal published today in its Op-Ed pages an article entitled “The problem with French banks” written by Mr. Nicolas Lecaussin.

This article quotes a certain anonymous BNP Paribas executive who states that the bank has a liquidity problem in dollars and is participating in the creation of a market in euros to solve the problem.

BNP Paribas categorically denies the statements made by this anonymous source and confirms that it is fully able to obtain USD funding in the normal course of business, either directly or through swaps.

BNP Paribas is surprised that the Wall Street Journal published this opinion containing both statements from an anonymous source, and a large number of unverified assertions and technical errors, without contacting the bank for verification.

Let us take a step back in time to March 10, 2008 when Bear Stearns released the following press release:

“There is absolutely no truth to the rumors of liquidity problems that circulated today in the market.”

By March 14th, Bear Stearns announced that it had received $30B in funding by JP Morgan that was backstopped by the government.

Posted in Markets, Media, Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .


United States Vs. Europe

The largely followed European stock index is the Eurostoxx 50 which represents 50 blue-chip stocks from the countries participating in the European Monetary Union.  With the current Eurozone crisis, these stocks have been under heavy fire.  Both the S&P 500 and the Eurostoxx 50 bounced hard from their March 2009 lows to 60%+ recoveries in price.  The major difference is what happened in 2011:

The Eurostoxx have been blasted to within about 11% of their 2008 lows whereas the S&P 500 has held onto the majority of its gains.

The Eurozone is facing massive political headwinds, but at a dividend yield of 5.98% and P/E of 8.35, it looks relatively attractive versus the S&P 500’s 2.23% dividend yield and 12.71 P/E.  Will the Eurozone unravel in a spectacular way?  I doubt it, but to hedge your bets you could buy European stocks and sell US stocks in the prospect that the two will close their valuation gap.  If the Eurozone truly does blow up then you would expect a liquidity black hole in which the US equity market would follow in a downward spiral.  The risk is a further divergence in valuations or divergence in currencies.  The latter can be hedged away by a smart investor.

What seems to be a good facilitator for this trade is the Vanguard MSCI European ETF (VGK).  Current yield is 5.62% with a low 16bps fee, 13.7% exposure to European banks, and largest holding of 2.89% (Nestle).

 

Posted in Markets, Politics, Trading Ideas.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Noteworthy News – September 12, 2011

Economy:

Eurozone blamed by US for world’s economic plight – Telegraph

The Greater Recession: America Suffers from a Crisis of Productivity – The Atlantic

US exports hit record high in July – BBC

What’s up with Europe’s economy — and why you should care – USA Today

Low interest rates don’t help sputtering economy – MarketWatch

Markets:

Euro Falls Most in a Year on Greek Financial Distress, ECB; Dollar Surges – Bloomberg

Stock markets plunge after Obama speech – Politico

Politics:

Obama’s Jobs Bill: A Reasonable Plan – Freakonomics

The solvency solution for Europe: time to do the unthinkable – Reuters

Ron Paul schools Bachmann on gas prices – examiner.com

Social Security: A monstrous truth – Economist

Our Guide to the Best Coverage on President Obama and the Economy – ProPublica

Banks:

‘Operation Twist’ Augurs Pain for Banks – Wall Street Journal

Posted in Economics, Markets, Media, Politics.


The Positive Feedback Loop

Positive might make it sound like a good thing, but positive feedback loops in the markets cause death spirals.  In the crisis of 2008 and the flash crash of 2010, high frequency trading was blamed as reason for market volatility.  In a way that is true, when high frequency trading computers sense massively dislocating markets they often shut off to stop their algorithms from losing too much money.  All of a sudden these electronic liquidity providers disappear and the market gaps around.  On the flip side, how is that different than the trading that occurred on October 19, 1987?  If you experienced or read about that day you would realize that the same thing happened, except instead of computers stepping away from the market it was the human market makers.

What I believe is common between these volatile periods is what can be called the positive feedback loop.  The positive feedback loop can be triggered by the act of rebalancing a hedge.  For insurance companies, mortgage providers, investment banks, and any other institutions sourcing embedded guarantees, a move in the financial markets causes these institutions to rebalance their positions primarily by using derivatives.  In the simple case of 1987, we blame the market spiral on “portfolio insurance” or put options that were placed on institutional and retail client portfolios.  These put options simply guaranteed that the client would not lose more than X%.  As markets tumbled, the institutions that offered the guarantee were required to sell more and more equities to protect the client’s assets.  When the market goes down, sell more.  When the market goes up, buy more.  A positive feedback loop.

This dynamic now occurs daily and in significant size by the largest financial institutions on the planet.  In addition, the larger the move in the markets the larger the required re-balancing hedge trades.   When looking at one company, this risk seems small, but when adding up all of these institutions hedging similar risks these trades become massive.  On top of these hedge trades, when the markets move negatively we find that both retail and institutional traders get scared.  They want to protect their assets so they often sell, which just creates further downward pressure on prices (upward on bonds). This is a positive feedback loop.

I believe that this dynamic has been missed by most market participants and commentators.  It is often stated that credit default swaps, the notional size of the derivatives markets, the trading of hedge funds, or the trading of black boxes have caused market volatility.  I think that market volatility has been created by easy monetary policy and the financial bubbles that were created as a consequence. Market volatility was amplified by the positive feedback loop of modern financial trading.

A Demon of Our Own Design: Markets, Hedge Funds, and the Perils of Financial Innovation

Inside markets, innovation, and risk

Why do markets keep crashing and why are financial crises greater than ever before? As the risk manager to some of the leading firms on Wall Street–from Morgan Stanley to Salomon and Citigroup–and a member of some of the world’s largest hedge funds, from Moore Capital to Ziff Brothers and FrontPoint Partners, Rick Bookstaber has seen the ghost inside the machine and vividly shows us a world that is even riskier than we think. The very things done to make markets safer, have, in fact, created a world that is far more dangerous. From the 1987 crash to Citigroup closing the Salomon Arb unit, from staggering losses at UBS to the demise of Long-Term Capital Management, Bookstaber gives readers a front row seat to the management decisions made by some of the most powerful financial figures in the world that led to catastrophe, and describes the impact of his own activities on markets and market crashes. Much of the innovation of the last 30 years has wreaked havoc on the markets and cost trillions of dollars. A Demon of Our Own Design tells the story of man’s attempt to manage market risk and what it has wrought. In the process of showing what we have done, Bookstaber shines a light on what the future holds for a world where capital and power have moved from Wall Street institutions to elite and highly leveraged hedge funds.Inside markets, innovation, and risk

Why do markets keep crashing and why are financial crises greater than ever before? As the risk manager to some of the leading firms on Wall Street–from Morgan Stanley to Salomon and Citigroup–and a member of some of the world’s largest hedge funds, from Moore Capital to Ziff Brothers and FrontPoint Partners, Rick Bookstaber has seen the ghost inside the machine and vividly shows us a world that is even riskier than we think. The very things done to make markets safer, have, in fact, created a world that is far more dangerous. From the 1987 crash to Citigroup closing the Salomon Arb unit, from staggering losses at UBS to the demise of Long-Term Capital Management, Bookstaber gives readers a front row seat to the management decisions made by some of the most powerful financial figures in the world that led to catastrophe, and describes the impact of his own activities on markets and market crashes. Much of the innovation of the last 30 years has wreaked havoc on the markets and cost trillions of dollars. A Demon of Our Own Design tells the story of man’s attempt to manage market risk and what it has wrought. In the process of showing what we have done, Bookstaber shines a light on what the future holds for a world where capital and power have moved from Wall Street institutions to elite and highly leveraged hedge funds.

 

Posted in Derivatives, Markets.

Tagged with , , , , .




Copyright © 2009-2013 SurlyTrader DISCLAIMER The commentary on this blog is not meant to be taken as an investment advice. The author is not a registered investment adviser. There is no substitute for your own due diligence. Please be aware that investing is inherently a risky business and if you chose to follow any of the advice on this site, then you are accepting the risks associated with that investment. The Author may have also taken positions in the stocks or investments that are being discussed and the author may change his position at any time without warning.

Yellow Pages for USA and Canada SurlyTrader - Blogged

ypblogs.com