Skip to content




Noteworthy News – May 7, 2012

Economy:

The Scariest Jobs Chart — By Far (And You Haven’t Seen It Before) – Investors.com

The 10 States and 10 Jobs With the Most Low-Wage Workers – The Atlantic

Why Did the Unemployment Rate Drop? – Wall Street Journal

The Most Important Economic Story Nobody Is Talking About – Atlantic

Markets:

A Lull, Then Trading Storm – Wall Street Journal

Food inflation seen back on the table as prices rise – Reuters

Politics:

Socialist Francois Hollande wins French presidency – BBC

Greek Election Gridlock Raises Risk for Bailout, Euro Future – Bloomberg

Banks:

China’s banks: Storing up trouble – Economist

Posted in Economics, Markets, Media, Politics.


Piece of My Mind – Grant

James Grant makes money selling a financial newsletter that primarily focuses on interest rates.  Grant’s “Interest Rate Observer” has become a respected piece of literature in the fixed income world and this is why the Federal Reserve invited Jim Grant to express his views.  If you have not read it already, I highly suggest the quick read: [Download not found]

The highlight is Grant’s view that this last great recession should not be viewed in isolation versus the great depression, but to other large contractions in national GDP such as the 1920-21 depression.  He strongly believes that the current morass could be better battled by letting the markets clear themselves rather than the perverse zero interest rate policy (ZIRP):

If Chairman Bernanke were in the room, I would respectfully ask him why this persistent harking back to the Great Depression? It is one cyclical episode, but there are many others. I myself draw more instruction from the depression of 1920-21, a slump as ugly and steep in its way as that of 1929-33, but with the simple and interesting difference that it ended. Top to bottom, spring 1920 to summer 1921, nominal GDP fell by 23.9%, wholesale prices by 40.8% and the CPI by 8.3%. Unemployment, as it was inexactly measured, topped out at about 14% from a pre-bust low of as little as 2%. And how did the administration of Warren G. Harding meet this macroeconomic calamity? Why, it balanced the budget, the president declaring in 1921, as the economy seemed to be falling apart, “There is not a menace in the world today like that of growing public indebtedness and mounting public expenditures.” And the fledgling Fed, face to face with its first big slump, what did it do? Why, it tightened, pushing up short rates in mid-depression to as high as 8.13% from a business cycle peak of 6%. It was the one and only time in the history of this institution that money rates at the trough of a cycle were higher than rates at the peak, according to Allan Meltzer.

But then something wonderful happened: Markets cleared, and a vibrant recovery began. There were plenty of bankruptcies and no few brickbats launched in the direction of the governor of the New York Fed, Benjamin Strong, for the deflation that cut an especially wide and devastating swath through the American farm economy. But in 1922, the first full year of recovery, the Fed’s index of industrial production leapt by 27.3%. By 1923, the unemployment rate was back to 3.2%. The 1920s began to roar.

 

Posted in Markets, Politics.

Tagged with , .


Dividends Out of Favor in 2012

In the last few years, dividends have garnered significant admiration.  In fact, many investors have begun to wonder whether they can count on price returns via P/E expansion or earnings growth at all.  If you only experienced the price return of the S&P 500 since the turn of the century through April 30, 2012, you would be down about 5%.  Thanks to dividends you are up nearly 20%.  If you had focused on high dividend payers such as the utility subsector of the S&P 500 or MLP’s through the Alerian MLP index, you would be up a whopping 103% and 824% respectively!

This story is highly reversed in 2012 as we have seen beta in play while the dividend payers are left behind:

A large part of the theme in 2012 has been driven by rising financial stocks with the financial sector up nearly 20%.  The real question is whether this euphoria can persist for the remainder of the year.  I have a feeling that Europe will continue to throw waves across the pond.  In addition, it is nearly a foregone conclusion that the United States will have another debt ceiling debate by the end of August. Election year or not, negative news events seem likely. The 4% yield on utility stocks might seem attractive once again.

Posted in Markets, Media, Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , .


Noteworthy News – April 30, 2012

Economy:

My Faith-Based Retirement – New York Times

Myth Of Decline: U.S. Is Stronger and Faster Than Anywhere Else – DailyBeast

The Three Wedges That Separate Workers From Their Pay – Bloomberg

Wasting Our Minds – (Krugman) New York Times

Markets:

World stock markets rise as hopes for Federal Reserve bond-buying grow – Washington Post

Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much? – Chicago Booth

Politics:

U.S. Perfecting Formula for Budget Failure, Says Bowles – Bloomberg

Political focus on Bank of Japan is necessary evil – MarketWatch

The Austerity Myth – The Spectator

Portuguese Finance Minister Admits Stimulus Failed; Don’t Expect Obama To Say Same – Forbes

Banks:

Protectionism Is on the Rise – Slate


Posted in Economics, Markets, Media, Politics.


Will House Prices Drop Further?

The decline in housing prices seems never ending.  Prices have dropped for over 5 years and some still expect the bottom to fall out from here.  One simple way to approach housing prices is to compare them against inflation.  In this example, we will look at the Case-Shiller Composite-10 Home Price Index and the CPI Urban Consumers Index Seasonally Adjusted Less Food and Energy.  The home price index includes the metropolitan areas of Boston, Chicago, Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington DC.  With this data, we can go back to Jan 1, 1987:

From this simple metric measured during this specific time period, we might conclude that housing prices need to drop another 15% to hit the inflation trend.  Unfortunately, nothing is ever that simple.  Each metro area is vastly different with prices in Las Vegas down a devastating 60%+ while prices in New York are down about 25% from the peak.  It is also very important to note that 30 year mortgage rates were well north  of 8% in the late ’80’s while the current rate is hovering below 4%.  On the flip side, bubbles usually correct further than “fair value”.  One easy conclusion: the bottom is a lot closer today than it was 5 years ago…

Posted in Economics, Markets.

Tagged with , , .




Copyright © 2009-2013 SurlyTrader DISCLAIMER The commentary on this blog is not meant to be taken as an investment advice. The author is not a registered investment adviser. There is no substitute for your own due diligence. Please be aware that investing is inherently a risky business and if you chose to follow any of the advice on this site, then you are accepting the risks associated with that investment. The Author may have also taken positions in the stocks or investments that are being discussed and the author may change his position at any time without warning.

Yellow Pages for USA and Canada SurlyTrader - Blogged

ypblogs.com